Editorial
Assessment editorial policy
These are the rules every assessment page on Novus Learn is written under. They exist so you can trust what a page says — and know exactly what it is not allowed to say.
Original content only
We never use leaked, recalled, or unlicensed live-test content, in any product line. Every practice question is written by Novus editors for its specific suite or form. Suites and forms are also never cloned from one another: parallel forms follow a shared blueprint but contain entirely separate questions, and a near-duplicate check is part of the publish gate.
Factual claims carry sources and dates
Public factual claims about official exams — who runs them, what they cover, where they apply — require a source dossier, and suite pages display a last-verified date next to an official-sources badge. Where we have no verified figure, we say nothing rather than estimate: this is why career pages, for example, link out to official labour statistics instead of inventing wages or outlooks.
No claim inflation
A suite is not marked complete because its route or card exists; publication requires finished research, blueprint, and full question banks. Preparation content is never presented as the official exam, practice results are never presented as predictions of exam performance, and the Reasoning Challenge is never presented as an IQ test — the reasons are documented on the methodology page. Descriptions of official exams state what we verified and when, never guarantees about current exam content, which the exam owner can change at any time.
Corrections
Every suite page carries a report-a-change link naming the exact suite, so an outdated profile, a defective question, or a broken source can be flagged from the page where you found it. Reports feed editorial review; fixes ship with the next content update. For anything else, use the contact page.